ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine2022
Automatic Image Segmentation of Monocytes and Index Computation Using Deep Learning.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The classification of white cells plays an important part in medical diagnosis. The counts may suggest the presence of infection, inflammation, anemia, bleeding, and other blood-associated issues. More specifically, the counting in our study is the calculation of the Monocyte Index (MI). The purpose of MI is to determine whether the patient can receive units of blood by analyzing the assay. In case of incompatible blood transfusion, monocytes may ingest or adhere red cells. The index is the percentage of red cells adhered, ingested, or both, versus free monocytes. Manual methods for blood cell counting may take several hours and are highly prone to different sources of errors. Automatic methods, such as Linear Discriminant Analysis, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Fast Region-based CNN, Faster Region-based CNN, Spatial Pyramidal Pooling network, Single Shot Detector and Mask Region-based CNN, exist for classification. However, these methods currently do not perform automatic counting and calculation of MI. The dataset is our own collection of images using ZEISS Axiocam 208 color/202 mono microscope camera. For the labels in our own collection, we performed polygonal annotation using the VGG Annotator tool. We trained the Mask R-CNN deep neural network model for automatic segmentation at the pixel-level, using COCO pre-trained weights. Our results look promising, as the Mask R-CNN can perform automatic segmentation with 72% accuracy. Compared to a medical laboratory scientist, the model can process large amount of data simultaneously, quickly and efficiently, with approximately the same judgment accuracy as a human eye. This may significantly reduce the burden of the laboratory scientist and provide a useful reference for doctors to identify a potential blood candidate to be transfused.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.