ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2025
Effectiveness of Second-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for the Treatment of Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective-Single Institution Study of 52 Vietnamese Patients.
Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Our aim was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy as second-line treatment in Vietnamese nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study of patients with advanced NSCLC who received pembrolizumab as second-line therapy at the Vietnam National Cancer Hospital between January 2017 and October 2023. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and tumor response. Results: A total of 52 patients were included. Adenocarcinoma was observed in 43 of 52 cases (82.7%), and 40.4% of patients had PD-L1 expression in at least 50% of tumor cells. Median body weight was 57 kg (range, 45-80), and 73.1% of patients received pembrolizumab at a dose of 100 mg/3 weeks, with a median dose of 1.9 mg/kg/3-weeks (range, 1.3-4.3). The overall response rate and disease control rate were 26.9% and 51.9%, respectively. Median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI, 3.3-9.7), and 1-year and 2-year PFS rates were 28.5% and 15.9%, respectively. Median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.8-14.2); 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS rates were 53.1%, 22.3%, and 8.5%, respectively. ECOG status and number of organs metastases were significantly associated with PFS and OS in the multivariate analysis. No adverse events of grades 3 to 4 were reported during the treatment. Conclusions: Second-line pembrolizumab has a good disease control rate and prolonged survival and is a viable option for the treatment of Vietnamese NSCLC patients. Further clinical studies are necessary to determine the effectiveness of administering a low dose of pembrolizumab in this setting, particularly in Asian population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.