ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2025
Age-Specific Impact of Cribriform Pattern in Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy.
Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and internal validation of a multivariable prediction model for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy ISUP Grade Group 1 prostate cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Association Between Cribriform Architecture and Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 in Prostate Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Association Between Cribriform Architecture and Lymphovascular Invasion in Prostate Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cribriform pattern 4 (CP4) is an aggressive variant in prostate cancer linked to worse clinical outcomes, including biochemical recurrence, metastases, and prostate cancer-specific mortality. However, its prognostic significance across age groups remains unclear. This study investigates whether the impact of CP4 on progression-free survival (PFS) differs by age in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: This retrospective analysis used patient data from the TCGA database, evaluating patients who underwent RP stratified by CP4 status. The primary outcome was PFS, defined as the time from RP to biochemical recurrence, radiographic progression, or death from any cause. Multivariable Fine-Gray competing risk regression analyses assessed the association between CP4 and PFS, adjusting for preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, tumor stage, and surgical margin status. An interaction term between age (dichotomized at 60 years to facilitate clinical interpretation and applicability, approximating the cohort median age of 61 years [interquartile range = 56-66]) and CP4 status was included in the analysis. Results: Of 431 patients, CP4 was present in 134 (31%). In multivariable analysis, CP4 was associated with significantly worse PFS in patients older than 60 years (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR]: 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-3.92, Conclusion: CP4 strongly predicts reduced PFS in patients above 60 years but not younger patients, suggesting that age may influence the clinical impact of CP4. These findings support age-specific risk stratification in CP4-positive prostate cancer. Prospective studies are needed to validate results and explore tailored treatment strategies based on age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.