ReviewThe archives of bone and joint surgery2025
Can Artificial Intelligence Reliably and Accurately Measure Lower Limb Alignment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are We Training Surgeons or Supervisors? Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and the Future of Surgical Expertise in Orthopedics.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and the State of the Art of Orthopedic Surgery.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a Catalyst for Orthopedic Residency Training.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Article
- Investigating the Effect of Center of Rotation of Angulation (CORA) Location on Varus Knee Joint Mechanics.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Article
- Closing 2025: Celebrating Knowledge, Spotlighting Key Advances, and Inviting the Next Wave.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Lower limb alignment (LLA) measurements are vital for pre-operative assessments and surgical planning in orthopedics. Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance the precision and consistency of these measurements. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the accuracy and reliability of AI-based approaches in detecting anatomical landmarks and measuring LLA angles, highlighting both their strengths and limitations. Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science on July 2024 and included observational studies validating AI-driven LLA measurements. Pooled intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed to assess inter-rater reliability between AI and manual measurements. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess study quality. Results: We reviewed 28 studies with 47,200 patients and 61,253 images; AI demonstrated high reliability in measuring 15 lower limb angles, with pooled ICCs ranging from 0.9811 to 1.0597. Angles like the hip-knee-ankle (HKA; ICC = 0.9987, 95% CI: 0.9975-0.9998) and the mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA; ICC = 1.0001, 95% CI: 1.0001-1.0001) showed near-perfect agreement. In contrast, the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and femoral anatomical-mechanical angle (FAMA) exhibited lower reliability and significant publication bias. Heterogeneity was substantial across most angles (I² = 63%-100%). These findings highlight the potential of AI for clinical applications while also identifying areas that require refinement and standardization. Conclusion: AI exhibits high reliability and accuracy in measuring key LLA angles, often outperforming manual techniques in both speed and consistency. It holds significant promise as a clinical tool, though challenges with less reliable angles warrant further refinement. Future studies should focus on standardizing landmark definitions and addressing implementation barriers to maximize AI's potential in orthopedic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.