ReviewThe archives of bone and joint surgery2025
Acromioclavicular Joint Injury: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 50 Most Cited Articles.
Review in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to identify the 50 most influential articles on acromioclavicular (AC) joint injury, exploring research trends and treatment options. Methods: Utilizing the Scopus database, the 50 top-cited articles were selected based on predefined criteria and analyzed for bibliometrics, including authorship, journal, and evidence level. Results: From 1963 to 2021, these articles amassed 3,363 citations, primarily comprising case series with level IV evidence, published across 19 journals from eight countries. Conclusion: This review highlights the dynamic progression in AC joint injury management and signals the urgent need for advanced research to enhance clinical decision-making and evidence-based practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.