ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2025
Outpatient versus At-Home Physical Therapy Following Distal Biceps Repair.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Distal biceps repair is a common orthopedic procedure, but there is still debate regarding the optimal post-operative care for patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of at-home physical therapy compared to outpatient physical therapy following distal biceps tendon repair. Methods: A retrospective review of distal biceps repairs performed between 2012 and 2017 by four fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons at one institution was undertaken. Patients were grouped into outpatient physical therapy and at-home therapy groups. Exclusion criteria included any patients who did not undergo a direct repair of the distal biceps and cases in which allograft augmentation was utilized. Postoperative complications were identified by manual chart review. After a minimum of three years follow-up, demographic information as well as elbow functional outcome scores including the Quick Dash, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, and Oxford Elbow Scores were obtained via phone calls and online surveys. Results: One hundred and forty-six patients were included in this study at a mean follow-up of 6.3 years for patients who attended outpatient physical therapy and 5.9 years for patients who performed an at-home therapy program. There were twenty-eight patients in the at-home physical therapy group and one hundred eighteen patients in the outpatient physical therapy group. There were two complications: one re-ruptured distal biceps tendon requiring a revision surgery in the at-home patient cohort, and one post-operative posterior interosseous nerve palsy that recovered after 6 months in the outpatient rehabilitation group. We found there was no significant difference between the two groups for any of the three functional elbow scores. Conclusion: Patients undergoing routine distal biceps repair may achieve similar clinical outcomes with a regimented at-home physical therapy protocol in lieu of formal outpatient physical therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.