ArticleMedical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal2025
Normative retinal thickness values in children, measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography.
Article in Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Normative Values of Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in a Healthy Pediatric Population Using DRI Triton SS-OCT.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Observational
- Macular, choroidal, and peripapillary OCT parameters in portuguese schoolchildren: normative data and associations with refractive status.Journal of optometry · 2026Article
- Comparison of Two Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomographs for Macular Thickness in Romanian Children Reveals Device-Dependent Normative Data and Significant Gender Differences.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, macular fovea thickness, and perimacular retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children with hyperopic amblyopia.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become essential in pediatric ophthalmology, normative data for children are lacking in most device databases. Due to ongoing ocular growth and developmental changes that occur during childhood and adolescence, adult reference values are not appropriate for pediatric use. Additionally, OCT measurements vary across devices, indicating the need for device-specific norms. In this study, we aimed to establish normative values for total macular retinal thickness, macular ganglion cell layer (GCL+) thickness, and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) thickness in children aged 5-17 years relevant to the Topcon DRI Triton Plus swept-source OCT device. Methods: We recruited children aged 5-17 years with normal ocular health, adequate visual acuity, and refractive errors within ±3.00 diopters (D) spherical and ≤ -1.00 D cylindrical under cycloplegia. Each child underwent comprehensive eye examinations and four OCT scans (two macular and two optic disc scans) using the Topcon DRI Triton Plus. Retinal thickness measurements were obtained from the eye with better visual acuity, or from a randomly selected eye in cases where both eyes had similar acuity. Scans were included if image quality was ≥40 and were free from artifacts or segmentation errors. Measurements were compared between age groups (5-7 and 8-17 years). Intra-visit repeatability was assessed using test-retest correlations based on repeated measurements obtained by the same examiner during a single visit. Results: Sixty-nine children (n = 33, 48% girls), with a median age of 7 years (5-7-year age group) and 13 years (8-17-year age group) were included. The total macular thickness was 287.5 µm (11.1) and 290.5 µm (13.8), GCL+ thickness was 75.7 µm (4.2) and 74.9 µm (5.2), and cpRNFL thickness was 111.5 µm (10.2) and 108.3 µm (7.9) for the 5-7-year and 8-17-year age groups, respectively (mean [standard deviation]). Mean retinal thickness measures did not differ significantly by age or sex (all Conclusions: This study provided normative values for macular total retinal thickness, macular GCL+ thickness, and cpRNFL thickness in children aged 5-17 years, measured using the Topcon DRI Triton Plus OCT device. We observed no significant age- or sex-based differences in these values, and measurement repeatability was excellent. Given the variability in retinal thickness across populations and devices, region- and device-specific pediatric norms are essential. These findings fill a critical gap in pediatric OCT normative databases and contribute to the development of reliable pediatric reference standards for swept-source OCT imaging. This may enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making in pediatric ophthalmology
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.