ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Routine Laboratory Markers-Based Machine Learning Model for Predicting Severe Kawasaki Disease in Pediatric Patients.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Severe Kawasaki disease (SKD) poses numerous risks. Early identification of SKD is crucial for precise pharmacological intervention, which can reduce the incidence of complications. This study introduces a novel machine learning approach for the early prediction of SKD in pediatric populations, utilizing routinely collected laboratory parameters. Methods: We extracted patients' age, sex, and 67 standard laboratory markers from the clinical records of 1,466 patients diagnosed with KD at the Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Using Lasso regression, we identified 15 critical predictors from the initial 69 candidates, demonstrating a significant impact on the accuracy of predictive outcomes. We forecasted the binary diagnosis of SKD or ordinary Kawasaki Disease (OKD) using 16 machine learning models, with model performance assessed through AUC-ROC, accuracy, F1 score, DCA, and calibration analysis. Results: Our study included 1,466 patients with KD, categorized into 1,286 cases of OKD and 180 cases of SKD. Both groups predominantly consisted of male. A significantly lower median age was observed in SKD patients (4.29 years) compared to the OKD group. In our comparative analysis of predictive models, the Gradient Boosting model (AUC 0.952) emerged as the most accurate, followed closely by Ada Boost (AUC 0.945), Random Forest (AUC 0.944), CatBoost (AUC 0.957), and Naive Bayes (AUC 0.951). The GBC model achieved a high accuracy of 0.925, with a sensitivity of 0.628, specificity of 0.967, precision of 0.740, and an F1 score of 0.666, underscoring its robustness in distinguishing between the two KD subgroups. Our analysis identified 15 independent predictors, including absolute basophil count and conjugated bilirubin, that significantly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of SKD. Conclusion: Our most effective model demonstrates commendable performance in differentiating OKD from SKD. This advancement empowers pediatric clinicians to make swift clinical decisions, facilitating prompt therapeutic intervention and preventing the onset of severe complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.