ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Sensorimotor correlates of sit-to-stand in healthy adults.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cycle Metrics and Strategy Detection for Automated Chair Sit-to-Stand Test Analysis Employing a Single Smartphone.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Neurophysiological insights into sit-to-stand post stroke.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Standing up, while one of the most common daily activities is also one of the most mechanically demanding tasks undertaken in daily life. Mobility impairments, in particular neurological conditions, often impede individuals' ability to stand up independently. Despite the obvious association between neurological disorders and impairment of sit-to-stand, the neurophysiological basis of this functional movement is not well understood, particularly at brain level. Methods: Subjects (N = 20, 4 males) performed fifteen sets of five sit-to-stand transitions on an armless, backless seat adjusted to the knee joint height of each participant. Electromyography (EMG) was recorded from the bilateral vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius. Surface electroencephalography (EEG) activity was recorded using eight focused bipolar channels over the sensorimotor cortex. Kinematic data was recorded using a three-dimensional motion capture camera system. Results: EMG and kinematic data confirm distinct flexion and extension phases of the movement with timed co-activation of the quadriceps and hamstrings, and gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior. EEG data demonstrates a change in cortical activity across the phases of sit-to-stand, notably event-related desynchronisation in the higher band frequencies (14-35 Hz) in the flexion and early extension phase, most prominent at the central Cz electrode. Corticomuscular coherence was observed during the flexion and extension phases between the Cz electrode and the biceps femoris and gastrocnemius, in a subgroup of participants. Discussion: This study provides insights into how cortical activity modulates movement execution during sit-to-stand. The event-related spectral perturbation data contributes to our understanding of this movement by revealing frequency specific changes in cortical activity across the phases of the sit-to-stand transition. Corticomuscular coherence was highest during the flexion phase when transitioning to extension, congruent with electroencephalography and Electromyography activity levels. Whether the brain activity observed is sufficient to distinguish between kinematic phases remains to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.