ArticleCureus2025
Perioperative Management of a Patient With Severe Bullous Emphysema.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with severe emphysematous bullae present significant anesthetic challenges, especially during laparoscopic or robotic-assisted surgeries, where positive pressure ventilation and pneumoperitoneum increase the risk of barotrauma. Rupture of a bulla can cause life-threatening tension pneumothorax, and intervention may be delayed in robotic cases due to limited access. A 62-year-old male patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and extensive bilateral bullous disease was scheduled for robotic-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Preoperative imaging revealed near-complete replacement of the upper right lung by giant bullae and substantial left-sided involvement. After a multidisciplinary discussion, the robotic approach was deemed unsafe due to the risk of bulla rupture during insufflation and positive pressure ventilation. Surgery was converted to an open repair under spinal anesthesia, with monitored anesthesia care using a propofol infusion. The patient remained hemodynamically stable, required no intraoperative airway intervention, and recovered without complication. This case highlights critical perioperative considerations in patients with bullous disease, including the limitations of chest tubes in decompressing a ruptured bulla with large bronchial communication, and the importance of individualized risk assessment beyond standard scoring systems. Preoperative imaging, multidisciplinary planning, and consideration of regional anesthesia can mitigate catastrophic complications. While alternative approaches such as regional blocks may offer a safer alternative for these patients, lung-protective ventilation strategies and avoidance of nitrous oxide are well-described for cases requiring general anesthesia. Patients with severe bullous emphysema require tailored perioperative planning. Early recognition, surgical approach modification, and the use of regional anesthesia can prevent life-threatening complications in high-risk non-thoracic surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.