ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Dynamic facial trustworthiness perception in real-time social contexts.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From screens to live interactions: Considerations for naturalistic EEG paradigms in social and affective neuroscience.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Current understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying facial trustworthiness perception is primarily based on studies using static facial stimuli. However, real-life social interactions are dynamic and complex, and the neural processes involved in such naturalistic contexts remain largely unexplored. Methods: In this study, we analyzed EEG data collected by Chen et al. (2024) during a deception game involving two participants: a player and an observer engaged in real-time interaction. The player either followed instructions or made spontaneous decisions to lie or tell the truth, while the observer judged whether to trust the player based solely on his or her facial expressions. We examined observers' behavioral data, event-related potentials, and interhemispheric EEG asymmetries in both signal magnitude and instantaneous phase. Results: The results revealed a significant effect of trustworthiness on hemispheric asymmetry in the observer's centroparietal phase activities especially after ~800 ms post-stimulus until the end of the trial at 3,000 ms post-stimulus. Subsequent frequency-based analysis revealed that this asymmetry in phase progression was primarily driven by lateralized signal frequency. Discussion: These findings suggest that the perception of facial trustworthiness involves dynamic hemispheric lateralization. Whereas previous studies using static face stimuli indicate that trustworthiness perception occurs rapidly, our findings suggest that trustworthiness perception can be modulated by persistent and dynamic affective processing in real-time social contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.