ArticleJournal of tropical medicine2025
Evaluation of a Fully Automated Assay for Detection of Antidengue IgM Antibodies in a Nonendemic Area.
Article in Journal of tropical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current French guidelines on the diagnosis of dengue infection recommend both nucleic acid testing and serology as tools for laboratory confirmation. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the fully automated Virclia IgM assay for the diagnosis of dengue infection. Samples from patients with a suspicion of dengue were prospectively tested using the Virclia Dengue IgM assay (Vircell) and subsequently underwent additional investigations (dengue RT-PCR and conventional dengue IgM EIA) at the French Reference Center for Arboviruses. A total of 104 patients were included with a median age of 34.3 years old and a median time since symptom (TSS) of 6 days. Dengue RT-PCR was positive in 57 patients (54.8%). The agreement was excellent (90.5%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.