Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40787096›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Lessons to be learned from an attempted RCT: iCHIMPS-an online intervention for adolescents with mentally Ill parents.

P Dülsen, K Barck, S Wiegand-Grefe, A Leidger, T Paumen, H Baumeister

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P DülsenDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
K BarckDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
S Wiegand-GrefeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
A LeidgerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
T PaumenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
H BaumeisterDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Children and adolescents with mentally ill parents represent an at-risk population for developing mental disorders themselves. Internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) have been demonstrated to be an effective, scalable, and temporally and geographically independent method of treatment delivery. However, evidence for IMIs aimed at children and adolescents remains limited and inconclusive, especially for children of mentally ill parents. Therefore, the present trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a mental health IMI (iCHIMPS) for children of parents with a mental illness. Due to insufficient recruitment, however, this article will primarily focus on lessons learned from the challenges encountered during the study's implementation. Methods: The IMI was targeted at children aged 12-18 years, regardless of whether they exhibited symptoms of mental disorders, provided that at least one parent had a diagnosed mental illness. To evaluate the effectiveness, the IMI was provided to one group [intervention group (IG)] while the control group received treatment as usual (TAU). At four measurement timepoints, the primary outcome (Youth Self-Report-YSR 11-18R) and various secondary outcomes were assessed. Recruitment from May 2021 to April 2023 initially took place at 21 participating mental health clinics throughout Germany and was later supplemented by various additional clinics as well as recruitment pathways. Results: In total, Conclusion: The identified reasons for the failed recruitment include the complex study design, particularly the presence of multiple concurrent trials recruiting from the same population, the inherent difficulty of reaching families with mentally ill parents, and the limitation of targeting the IMI solely at adolescents rather than involving families more broadly. Additionally, the design may not have been sufficiently engaging or appealing to adolescents. These reasons are discussed along with the implications for future IMI research involving children and adolescents. Clinical Trial Registration: identifier (DRKS00025158).

Indexed as

children and adolescentse-healthInternet- and mobile-based interventionmentally ill parentsonline intervention

Identifiers

PMID40787096
PMCPMC12331599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.