ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Lessons to be learned from an attempted RCT: iCHIMPS-an online intervention for adolescents with mentally Ill parents.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children and adolescents with mentally ill parents represent an at-risk population for developing mental disorders themselves. Internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) have been demonstrated to be an effective, scalable, and temporally and geographically independent method of treatment delivery. However, evidence for IMIs aimed at children and adolescents remains limited and inconclusive, especially for children of mentally ill parents. Therefore, the present trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a mental health IMI (iCHIMPS) for children of parents with a mental illness. Due to insufficient recruitment, however, this article will primarily focus on lessons learned from the challenges encountered during the study's implementation. Methods: The IMI was targeted at children aged 12-18 years, regardless of whether they exhibited symptoms of mental disorders, provided that at least one parent had a diagnosed mental illness. To evaluate the effectiveness, the IMI was provided to one group [intervention group (IG)] while the control group received treatment as usual (TAU). At four measurement timepoints, the primary outcome (Youth Self-Report-YSR 11-18R) and various secondary outcomes were assessed. Recruitment from May 2021 to April 2023 initially took place at 21 participating mental health clinics throughout Germany and was later supplemented by various additional clinics as well as recruitment pathways. Results: In total, Conclusion: The identified reasons for the failed recruitment include the complex study design, particularly the presence of multiple concurrent trials recruiting from the same population, the inherent difficulty of reaching families with mentally ill parents, and the limitation of targeting the IMI solely at adolescents rather than involving families more broadly. Additionally, the design may not have been sufficiently engaging or appealing to adolescents. These reasons are discussed along with the implications for future IMI research involving children and adolescents. Clinical Trial Registration: identifier (DRKS00025158).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.