Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40787033›Full record

ArticleMissouri medicine

Opioid Exposure and Associated Numeric Pain Scores in Adults with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.

Ray Segebrecht, Abat Khan, Xiangni Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ray SegebrechtAssistant Professor, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Abat KhanDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Memorial Healthcare System, Florida, USA.
Xiangni WuResident, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri- Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The opioid epidemic claims tens of thousands of lives annually in the United States (US) where opioids are prescribed more per capita than in any other country. Primary care providers contribute to nearly half of these prescriptions, often for chronic non-cancer pain conditions such as back, hip, and knee pain. Despite widespread use, evidence suggests that opioids do not improve pain control for chronic non-cancer musculoskeletal pain. This study aimed to assess whether an opioid prescription in the three months preceding internal medicine primary care appointments was associated with lower pain levels, as reported on a 1 to 10 scale during medical assistant check-ins, among patients with chronic non-cancer musculoskeletal pain. Using a cross-sectional design, we analyzed pain scores for adult patients who had been prescribed opioids versus those who had not. Our findings revealed no statistically significant difference in pain levels between the two groups, with both opioid and non-opioid users reporting similar median pain scores. These results align with existing evidence, reinforcing the notion that opioids offer no substantial advantage in pain management for chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidChronic PainMusculoskeletal PainAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementUnited StatesAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID40787033
PMCPMC12331328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.