ArticleCampbell systematic reviews2025
Protocol: Interventions to Prevent Cognitive and Behavioural Violent Radicalisation: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis: A Systematic Review.
Article in Campbell systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to systematically evaluate the available evidence on the effectiveness of various interventions aimed at reducing violent radicalisation and terrorism. Quantitative analysis will be employed to assess the overall impact and identify the factors that influence it. The key research questions are: (1) What interventions are successful (A successful intervention will be defined as one that effectively reduces cognitive radicalisation (e.g., extremist beliefs or ideological commitment), reduces behavioural radicalisation (e.g., intentions or actions related to violent extremism), prevents at-risk individuals from becoming radicalised (counter-radicalisation), or facilitates the disengagement and de-radicalisation of individuals already involved in extremist activities or networks) in preventing or reducing violent radicalisation and terrorism? (2) Are certain preventive strategies more effective than others? (3) How do participants' characteristics influence programme outcomes? (4) How do the features of interventions, their implementation, and methodologies impact the effectiveness of terrorism prevention? The review will conduct analyses considering participant characteristics (e.g., age, gender, risk level), intervention components (e.g., theoretical foundations, theory of change), implementation (e.g., facilitator training, dosage), and methodological aspects (e.g., study design). The goal is to identify the most effective interventions, the target groups they work for, and the conditions under which they are most successful.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.