ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025
Comparative Study between Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TF-LIF) Using PETLIF System and Minimally Invasive TLIF for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disorders.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Cortical Bone Trajectory and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in PETLIF: Short-Term Perioperative Muscle Injury and Pain Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To compare the clinical outcomes between a full-endoscopic transforaminal approach lumbar interbody fusion (TF-LIF) using the percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PETLIF) system and a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Methods: A total of 102 patients (80 females, 22 males; mean age: 70.0 years) with degenerative lumbar spine disorders who underwent PETLIF and were followed up for 2 years were assigned to the PETLIF group. Based on age, sex, and operated lumbar levels in the PETLIF group, 100 patients (71 women and 29 men; mean age: 68.9 years) who underwent MIS-TLIF were randomly selected and included in the MIS-TLIF group. This retrospective investigation included surgical data, radiographic assessment, and clinical outcomes. Results: The fusion rate was 95.1% and 96.0% in the PETLIF and MIS-TLIF groups, respectively ( Conclusions: Compared with MIS-TLIF, PETLIF showed excellent bone fusion rate and clinical outcomes. It was minimally invasive, resulting in less blood loss. However, exiting nerve root injury was a PETLIF-specific complication, and proper preventive management, including techniques to enlarge the Kambin's triangle, is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.