ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
The Use of a Horizontal Reference Line While Measuring the Anterior Center Edge Angle Is More Reliable Than the Traditional Method.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The anterior center edge angle (ACEA) is a radiographic parameter commonly utilized for the assessment of anterior acetabular coverage in the setting of various hip abnormalities. However, this measurement is greatly dependent on patient positioning and imaging technique. Purpose: To evaluate the utility of a measurement technique utilizing a horizontal reference line and femoral head perfect circles for better control of pelvic obliquity and the assessment of its potential as a more reproducible method for determining the ACEA. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: There were 3 authors who retrospectively reviewed the false-profile radiographs of 21 patients. Traditional ACEA measurements and novel ACEA measurements utilizing a horizontal reference line and best-fit circles on each femoral head were recorded by each author on 2 separate occasions. A paired Results: The mean ACEA value obtained using the traditional method was 39.72°, and the mean ACEA value obtained using the novel method was 37.68° ( Conclusion: The novel method of measurement was found to have strong agreement within each reviewer across both measurement attempts as well as between all 3 physician reviewers. The traditional method was found to have weak intrarater reliability for 1 of 3 physician reviewers and weak interrater reliability for 2 of 3 reviewers. These results demonstrate that the novel method was more reproducible across individual reviewers and between different reviewers. As such, consideration should be given to utilizing the novel method for measuring the ACEA as a standardized technique in future research efforts on hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.