ArticleCancer management and research2025
Development and Cross-Institutional Validation of a Comprehensive Machine Learning Model Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Accurately identifying patients achieving pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) not only ensures treatment efficacy but also helps avoid surgical risks. We developed a comprehensive multi-omics model to predict pCR before surgery. Methods: Clinical data, CT, MRI-T1WI and MRI-T2WI, and radiotherapy dose were collected from 183 LARC patients who underwent preoperative nCRT. Backward stepwise selection, logistic regression, and five-fold cross-validation were employed for the development and validation of a non-imaging model, three radiomics-based models and a dosiomics-based model. These were integrated into a final model, and its performance was tested on multi-center sets. Results: C_model, based on clinical characteristics, achieved an AUC of 0.85 in the validation set. Radiomics models (CT_model, T1_model, T2_model) exhibited AUCs of 0.66, 0.67, and 0.64, respectively. Dosiomics-based model, D_model, achieved an AUC of 0.75 in validation. The mean AUCs for F_model in the training sets, validation sets, internal and external test sets were 0.90, 0.88, 0.77, and 0.74, respectively. Conclusion: To assess the efficacy of nCRT in LARC patients, it is crucial to consider clinical characteristics, followed by dosiomics. While T1_model, T2_model and CT_model demonstrate relatively comparable performance, each contributes unique value to the final prediction model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.