Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40786911›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2025

Development and Cross-Institutional Validation of a Comprehensive Machine Learning Model Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer.

Sha Li, Zhengxian Li, Shuai Li, Ping Jiang, Hongbin Han, Yibao Zhang, Yanye Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sha LiInstitute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2297-9569
Zhengxian LiDepartment of Radiotherapy, Guowen Hospital, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Shuai LiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education / Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7577-9704
Ping JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8820-489X
Hongbin HanInstitute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yibao ZhangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education / Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yanye LuInstitute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3063-8051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Accurately identifying patients achieving pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) not only ensures treatment efficacy but also helps avoid surgical risks. We developed a comprehensive multi-omics model to predict pCR before surgery. Methods: Clinical data, CT, MRI-T1WI and MRI-T2WI, and radiotherapy dose were collected from 183 LARC patients who underwent preoperative nCRT. Backward stepwise selection, logistic regression, and five-fold cross-validation were employed for the development and validation of a non-imaging model, three radiomics-based models and a dosiomics-based model. These were integrated into a final model, and its performance was tested on multi-center sets. Results: C_model, based on clinical characteristics, achieved an AUC of 0.85 in the validation set. Radiomics models (CT_model, T1_model, T2_model) exhibited AUCs of 0.66, 0.67, and 0.64, respectively. Dosiomics-based model, D_model, achieved an AUC of 0.75 in validation. The mean AUCs for F_model in the training sets, validation sets, internal and external test sets were 0.90, 0.88, 0.77, and 0.74, respectively. Conclusion: To assess the efficacy of nCRT in LARC patients, it is crucial to consider clinical characteristics, followed by dosiomics. While T1_model, T2_model and CT_model demonstrate relatively comparable performance, each contributes unique value to the final prediction model.

Indexed as

dosiomicsnCRTpredict therapy responseradiomicsrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID40786911
PMCPMC12335272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.