ArticleInnovations in clinical neuroscience
Validation of a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Quantifying Risk of Torsades de Pointes in a Psychiatric Inpatient Population.
Article in Innovations in clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePsychiatric inpatients often require complex medication regimens due to the refractory nature of their serious mental illness (SMI) and the high prevalence of medical comorbidities. Among the many inherent issues associated with these regimens are the potential pharmacodynamic drug interactions resulting in an increased risk of QTc prolongation and the potential sequelae, Torsades de Pointes (TdP). This study builds on previous research that demonstrated the utility of the MedSafety Scan (MSS) clinical decision support (CDS) tool by establishing theoretical evidence from patients with SMI but did not provide objective data to validate its use in this population. This has left prescribers questioning whether the MSS CDS tool is capable of accurately guiding prescribing decisions in this vulnerable patient population. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the degree of correlation between psychiatric patients' QTc intervals and their MSS-calculated TdP risk scores to objectively validate the predictive impact and clinical value of the MSS tool in psychiatric inpatients for the purpose of informing safe prescribing.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between participants' MSS TdP risk scores and their QTc Δ, defined as the difference between participants' measured QTc intervals and sex-specific QTc prolongation thresholds (female individuals: 470ms; male individuals: 450ms). The MSS TdP risk score is calculated based on patient demographic data, medical diagnoses, serum electrolyte values, and medications. Data from 251 subjects were extracted from an adult inpatient psychiatric facility's electronic medical record system from February 1, 2018, through November 30, 2023. Inpatients with a documented electrocardiogram during the study period were eligible for inclusion, and the exclusion criterion was having a Criminal Procedure Law (CPL) designation. Data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with alpha set to 0.01.
resultsThe data from the ANOVA that compared participants' QTc Δ to MSS TdP risk score were found to be significant (
conclusionThis study showed that the MSS CDS tool accurately reflected the relationship between our psychiatric inpatients' measured QTc intervals and their predicted MSS TdP risk scores, which objectively validated the predictive impact and clinical utility of this tool in our psychiatric population. Prescribers can use this tool to mitigate QTc prolongation risk for patients without underlying, unknown congenital risk; therefore, this can be an important course of action in treating psychiatric patients, given their predisposition to decreased lifespans and their increased risk of QTc prolongation due to SMI-related proarrhythmic factors. The MSS tool is an open-source, web-based CDS tool that provides comprehensive analyses of TdP risk, drug interactions, and duplicate therapies, and produces a detailed patient-specific report that allows for documentation of management plans. These features prove MSS to be a valuable tool for psychiatric inpatient clinicians to establish an initial basic clinical impression to advise need for additional comprehensive medical follow-up, cardiology consultation, or pharmacotherapeutic modifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40786905PMC12333500What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.