ReviewInternational journal of nursing sciences2025
Efficacy and safety of exercise rehabilitation in the vulnerable phase in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in International journal of nursing sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Clinical Audit on Follow-Up Time of Patients Admitted With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the impact of exercise rehabilitation during the vulnerable period on cardiac recovery (CR) outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Methods: Multiple databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), Wanfang database, SinoMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and American Heart Association (AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) were searched for RCTs on exercise rehabilitation in ADHF patients' vulnerable period from inception to April 2, 2025. The risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0, and data were analyzed in RevMan 5.3. Results: A total of seven RCTs involving 946 patients were included. The results demonstrated that exercise rehabilitation training during the vulnerable period in patients with ADHF significantly increased the 6-min walk test distance (6-MWTD) ( Conclusions: Exercise rehabilitation during the vulnerable phase improves exercise tolerance, QoL, and depressive symptoms while reducing 6-month all-cause readmissions in ADHF patients, with no reported adverse events. Although trends toward improved LVEF, HF-related readmissions, and all-cause mortality were observed. Large-scale, high-quality studies are warranted to explore individualized responses and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.