ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2025
Translation, validity, and reliability of the Thai de Morton Mobility Index in patients following hip surgery.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to translate the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) into Thai and assess its measurement properties. Methods: The de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) was translated into Thai using a cross-cultural translation method. A cross-sectional study was conducted in four public hospitals in Thailand between January and March 2023. A total of 260 patients were recruited from outpatient clinics. Convergent and known-group validity were evaluated through hypothesis testing. Construct validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient. We also employed the Rasch analysis to validate validity and person reliability. Results: Content validity was high (S-CVI = 0.96, I-CVI range: 0.80-1.00). Strong convergent validity was observed, with a significant correlation ( Conclusion: This study demonstrated the acceptable validity and reliability of the Thai DEMMI. Further evaluation of its responsiveness to change is still recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.