ReviewInternational journal of nursing sciences2025
Quality of life experience in physically frail people on renal dialysis: A qualitative meta-synthesis on the difficulties and resources for better health care.
Review in International journal of nursing sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to summarize the quality of life experiences of individuals with physical frailty undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis and to identify the difficulties and resources that enable better person-centered health care. Methods: The study described is a qualitative meta-synthesis literature review. The search was performed in databases such as CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Cuiden Plus through Medical Subject Headings and free terms. Qualitative and mixed studies were included on individuals undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, 18 years of age or older, published in English or Spanish, between January 2013 and January 2024. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality. The information was analyzed and coded through a socioecological model and the social determinants of health. Results: Fourteen qualitative and two mixed articles were selected. A total of 256 individuals participated in the study. Seventeen themes and 25 sub-themes were identified and grouped into two blocks (difficulties and resources). The difficulties that stood out were a low tolerance for activities of daily living and physical activity, loss of self-control over life and social roles, and lack of community and public resources. As for the resources, the following was found: the positive meaning of dialysis, the safety offered by close individuals and the healthcare team, the activation of specific programs, and person-centered policies Conclusions: The analysis and interpretation of the identified difficulties and resources revealed key elements to consider when designing and implementing health programs for individuals undergoing dialysis. Future research should explore these dimensions in diverse cultural and geographical contexts to enhance generalizability and support health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.