ReviewFood science & nutrition2025
Can Metagenomic Analyses Be Used Effectively in Safe Food Production?
Review in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial Survival, Sublethal Injury, and Recovery in Frozen Food Systems: Implications for Safety, Quality Deterioration, and Cold-Chain Control.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Unveiling lentil responses to salt stress and gibberellic acid: phenotypic, bioactive and enzymatic dynamics.Biologia futura · 2026Article
- Article
- Filtering for truth: high-precision taxonomic classification in nanopore shotgun metagenomics data through a KMA-based bioinformatic pipeline (KAPTAIN).BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Detection ofFood chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Can Metagenomic Analyses Be Used Effectively in Safe Food Production?Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to bring together current research on the importance, recent applications, and possible impacts of metagenomic analysis and emphasize that metagenomic analyses, which provide direct analysis of the genomes of the food itself and all the microbiota in its environment, are revolutionary approach for effective management of food safety requirements. The increasing health problems in recent years and the related developments regarding nutritional awareness have led people to seek safe food consumption. In order to ensure the quality and safety of food products and protect the health consumers worldwide, necessary preventive measure should be taken by conducting innovative control methods. Numerous microbial hazards threaten food safety worldwide. In this respect, rapid and accurate detection of pathogens is critical. Although traditional culture-based methods continue to be widely used, they often fail to detect organisms that are viable but cannot be cultured. This limitation has led to the increasing adoption of metagenomic analyses, which allow direct genome-level detection and provide a more comprehensive view of microbial communities in food systems. In this context, metagenomic analyses within new-generation technology has been inspired, as it can be a powerful tool to ensure food safety. In this study, for this purpose, the keywords 'metagenomics and food' and the studies on metagenomics published in English, peer-reviewed journals, and available in the Web of Science and Scopus databases were investigated. The years 2020-2024 were taken as a basis for the studies with the keywords identified and studies on antibiotic resistance and unrelated foods were excluded from the review's scope. This review brings together current research on the significance of metagenomics analysis in food safety, its latest applications, and possible effects. The study is a reference source for potential studies to be carried out in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.