Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40786806›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025

Histological Dedifferentiation in Recurrent Adamantinoma of the Tibia: A Case Report.

Pavithra Ethirajan, Archana Lakshmanan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pavithra EthirajanDepartment of Histopathology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Archana LakshmananDepartment of Histopathology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Adamantinoma is a primary low-grade malignant bone tumor. It is most common in tibia with slight predilection in males. Dedifferentiated adamantinoma is an aggressive variant with worse prognosis. Case Report: Patient is a 70-year-old female who presented with leg pain. Imaging showed a lytic lesion in the metaphyseo diaphyseal region. Curettings were done and were reported as adamantinoma. Two years later, the patient presented with a recurrent lesion at the same site. Histopathology showed a neoplasm with focal classical adamantinoma and many areas with aggressive morphology including sarcomatoid differentiation. The neoplastic cells in high-grade areas were positive for vimentin with variable loss of cytokeratin. Proliferative index as determined by Ki67 was 20-25% in these areas. With these given immuno-morphological findings, a diagnosis of dedifferentiated adamantinoma was rendered. Conclusion: Dedifferentiated adamantinoma is an unusual and aggressive variant of adamantinoma. This case highlights the awareness of such a rare entity, thereby preventing misdiagnosis and improper treatment.

Indexed as

Adamantinomamalignantosteofibrous dysplasiasarcomatibia

Identifiers

PMID40786806
PMCPMC12328938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.