Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40786755›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025

Outcome of Type III Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Treatment by Closed Reduction and Different Configuration of Percutaneous K-wire Technique in Children.

Ritesh Parteti, Kishor Uikey, Jayant Kothale, P Mohamed Azlam, Prashant Mishra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ritesh PartetiDeptartment of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Seoni, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Kishor UikeyDeptartment of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Seoni, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Jayant KothaleDeptartment of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Seoni, Madhya Pradesh, India.
P Mohamed AzlamDeptartment of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Seoni, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Prashant MishraDeptartment of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Seoni, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Supracondylar humerus fractures comprise 17% of all pediatric fractures and are second in frequency to forearm fractures. According to an epidemiological study, the incidence of fracture supracondylar humerus is 308/100000/year in the general population. It is also the most common pediatric fracture around the elbow. Fracture involving lateral condyle shows swelling, tenderness, and crepitus over lateral condyle, whereas in supracondylar fracture, tenderness and swelling involve medial supracondylar ridge and the lateral supracondylar ridge. Objectives: (1) To assess mechanical stability and functional mobility in cross, lateral divergent, lateral parallel, and three-pin Kirschner wire fixation. (2) To assess radiological outcome in cross, lateral divergent, lateral parallel, and three-pin Kirschner wire fixation. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the hospital attached to Government Bundelkhand Medical College, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, from July 2021 to August 2022. During this period, 60 cases of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children were treated with cross pinning and lateral pinning with Kirschner wires according to odd and even randomization. Results: A total of 60 participants were selected with a mean age of 8.6 (±2.6) years, a minimum was 4 years, and maximum were 12 years. Thirty-nine was male and 21 was female. Out of 60 cases, 17 (28.3%) cases were operated by two cross K-wire, 18 (30%) were by two lateral k-wire divergent, 15 (25%) were by two lateral K-wire parallel, and 10 (16.7%) cases were operated by three-pin (2 lateral and 1 medial). The carrying angle of the normal elbow was 11.8 ± 1.9, 11.9 ± 2.4, 11.0 ± 1.6, 11.7 ± 1.8 among two cross K-wire and two lateral (divergent), two lateral (parallel), three-pin K-wire groups, respectively. The differences in the angle in these groups were not statistically significant. Conclusion: In our study, two lateral divergent K-wire or two lateral parallel K-wire fixation method provided safe, better functional and radiological outcomes as well as equal mechanical stability as compared to two cross K-wire or three pinning in most of the patients.

Indexed as

closed reductionK-wireSHFSupracondylar humerus fracturetype III

Identifiers

PMID40786755
PMCPMC12328948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.