Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40786667›Full record

ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy

Comparison of Prognosis between Abdominal and Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomies in Early-stage Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

I-Chun Huang, Pei-Chen Li, Dah-Ching Ding

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Advances in Women's Health Research.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

I-Chun HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Pei-Chen LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Dah-Ching DingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: There is still ongoing debate regarding the surgical approach for early-stage cervical cancer. We aimed to compare the outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer and compare our results with those of previous studies. Materials and Methods: This study included patients with early-stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics ≤ stage IIA) who received treatment from January 2002 to December 2022. Clinical, surgical, pathological, recurrence, and survival data were collected and analyzed using suitable statistical methods. Results: Of the 71 patients, 54 underwent ARH and 17 underwent LRH. The median follow-up durations were 117.0 months for the ARH group and 64.4 months for the LRH group. The average age of patients was 53.7 years, with a mean body mass index of 24.2 kg/m Conclusion: Early-stage cervical cancer patients who received LRH had survival and recurrence outcomes comparable to those who underwent ARH.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerminimally invasive surgeryopen surgeryrecurrencesurvival

Identifiers

PMID40786667
PMCPMC12334104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.