ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025
Who are the women having non-institutional deliveries in Brazil and who attends them? An analysis of 13.7 million births, 2018-2022.
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Who are the women having non-institutional deliveries in Brazil and who attends them? An analysis of 13.7 million births, 2018-2022.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify groups of women in Brazil more likely to have deliveries outside health facilities and the types of professionals attending these deliveries, and to assess related social determinants. Methods: Data from Brazil's Live Birth Information System from 2018 to 2022 were used to investigate non-institutional deliveries by region of residence, ethnicity/skin color, schooling, and maternal age at delivery. Associations between these factors were also assessed. The proportion of births attended by doctors, nurses/midwives, traditional birth attendants, and others was also analyzed, comparing institutional and non-institutional deliveries. Results: The overall prevalence of non-institutional deliveries was 1.0%. Higher proportions were observed in the North region (4.0%), and among Indigenous women (26.3%), adolescent mothers (1.4%), and women with fewer than 4 years of schooling (8.3%). The proportion of non-institutional deliveries was 67.6% among, Indigenous women from the North region with little education. Indigenous women with fewer than 4 years of schooling and who had a non-institutional delivery had the highest proportion of deliveries without a qualified professional (95.2%). Conclusions: Cultural norms and barriers to accessing maternity services, combined with broader social inequalities and organizational challenges faced by Indigenous populations, may contribute to the high proportion of non-institutional deliveries without a skilled attendant observed among these women. Culturally sensitive strategies to expand access to maternity care for and empower Indigenous women are crucial to ensure their and their children's survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.