ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Treatment of blood blister-like aneurysms of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery using pipeline and lattice flow diverters and coiling.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and efficacy of flow diversion for blood blister aneurysms: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Flow diverters (FDs) have shown the potential to treat blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA). We report a series of cases treated by both deploying FDs and coiling. Methods: Based on the Bojanowski classification, the BBAs of the supraclinoid ICA were classified into types I-IV. Based on the approach used for endovascular treatment (EVT) of the BBAs, the EVTs were categorized into types 1-3. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to assess the clinical follow-up outcome. Results: Thirteen patients with 13 BBAs of the supraclinoid ICA who were aged 22-66 (49.8 ± 13.5) years were included. There were 12 females and 1 male. All patients had experienced subarachnoid hemorrhage. According to the Bojanowski's et al. classification, a total of 2, 7, 3, and 1 BBAs were categorized as types I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Preoperative vasospasms were detected in 4 patients. EVT types 1, 2, and 3 were used to treat 4, 7, and 2 BBAs, respectively. After EVT, 2 patients with preoperative vasospasm experienced hemiparesis but later recovered. One patient with a preoperative vasospasm experienced multiple infarctions and died. One patient who discontinued antiplatelet therapy experienced multiple infarctions and suffered severe disability. Twelve patients completed a post-EVT six-month follow-up, excluding the one with postoperative mortality. The mRS scores were 0, 1, and 4 for 10, 1, and 1 patients, respectively. Eleven patients were subjected to angiographic follow-up. All BBAs were cured, and the supraclinoid ICAs were repaired. Conclusion: For patients with BBAs, deploying an FD and coiling can yield good outcomes. However, ischemic complications should not be overlooked.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.