ArticleAJO international2024
FaceFinder: A machine learning tool for identification of facial images from heterogenous datasets.
Article in AJO international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To develop an algorithm to automate the organization of large photo databases using the Haar cascade algorithm for face and eye detection and machine learning tools in Python. Design: Retrospective study for the purposes of clinical tool development. Methods: We developed an algorithm, termed FaceFinder, to identify front facing images in a large dataset of facial, orthodontal and miscellaneous images. FaceFinder works by detecting the presence of faces and at least two eyes using the Haar cascade. Execution time was recorded using different-sized datasets. A total of 895 images were analyzed by FaceFinder using various thresholds for face and eye detection. Precision, recall, specificity, accuracy, and F1 score were computed by comparison to ground truth labels of the images as determined by a human grader. Results: Using medium thresholds for face and eye detection, FaceFinder reached recall, accuracy, and F1 score of 89.3%, 91.6%, and 92.9%, respectively with an execution time per image was 0.91 s. Using the highest threshold for face and eye detection, FaceFinder achieved precision and specificity values of 98.3% and 99.2% respectively. Conclusions: FaceFinder is capable of sorting through a heterogenous dataset of photos of patients with craniofacial disease and identifying high-quality front-facing facial images. This capability allows for automated sorting of large databases that can facilitate and expedite data preparation for further downstream analyses involving artificial intelligence and facial landmarking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.