ArticleEvidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health2024
A qualitative exploration of research-school partnerships during COVID: How to better serve our community partners during times of crisis.
Article in Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most youth access mental health care through their school. As such, research has targeted schools as ideal service settings to reduce disparities in service use among adolescents. The COVID shutdowns were associated with elevated stress and depression across caregivers, teachers, and students, and increased rates of suicide amongst youth. In the virtual space, schools had difficulty maintaining needed supports. Negative impacts were disproportionately experienced by Black communities and urban school settings. The shutdown also disrupted most research efforts occurring in school settings, leaving schools with even fewer supports when most in need. Thus, the current qualitative study aimed to obtain feedback from personnel in an urban high school system on how research-community partnerships could better support schools generally and especially during times of crisis. Our sample consisted of 17 teachers and school-based mental health providers who participated in virtual qualitative interviews or focus groups. Four key themes emerged, calling for reform in how research partners interact with school partners: 1) embed the researcher in the community, 2) utilize the researcher as an allied communicator, 3) empower the researcher to adapt in response to shifting demands, 4) establish the researcher as a long-term partner. Findings call for reform in how community-based research is funded to better allow researchers to develop long-standing, culturally responsive, and mutually beneficial partnerships, particularly in times of crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.