ArticleJMA journal2025
The Impact of Intradialytic Exercise on Activities of Daily Living and Physical Function in Hospitalized Hemodialysis Patients: A Study of Efficacy and Safety.
Article in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07591714 (The Effect of Intradialytic Eye Exercise on Physical Function, Balance, and Fall Risk in Hemodialysis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Intradialytic Eye Exercise on Physical Function, Balance, and Fall Risk in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Pilot Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Type 2 Diabetes and Hemodialysis: Metabolic Challenges and the Role of Intradialytic Exercise.Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to examine the effects of intradialytic exercise (IDE) on improving activities of daily living (ADL) and physical function in hospitalized hemodialysis (HD) patients. The research question focused on improving outcomes in ADL and physical function. Methods: This study is a single-center, historical cohort study. Subjects were hospitalized HD patients undergoing rehabilitation between April 2017 and February 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: the IDE group, which received IDE, and the non-IDE group, which did not. The outcomes measured were Barthel Index (BI), grip strength, isometric knee extension strength (IKES), 10-meter walking speed (10MWS), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Outcome measures were taken at admission and discharge, and changes were analyzed using a linear mixed model. Results: The study included 76 participants (IDE group: 13, non-IDE group: 63). The IDE group showed significant improvements in ΔBI (13.7 [0.96-26.38] points) and Δ10MWS (0.25 [0.05-0.45] m/sec) (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in ΔGrip strength (2.10 [-0.40 to 4.60] kg), ΔIKES (7.40 [-2.20 to 17.02] %), or ΔSPPB (1.23 [-0.48 to 2.94] points) (p > 0.05). However, the IDE group showed significant pre-post improvements in grip strength (1.55 [1.46-1.65] kg) and SPPB (2.44 [1.34-3.55] points) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: IDE contributed to greater improvements in BI and 10MWS in HD patients. These findings suggest that adding IDE to inpatient rehabilitation may enhance functional recovery in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.