ArticleCureus2025
Acceptance of Pulmonary Telerehabilitation Among Healthcare Practitioners.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPulmonary rehabilitation is a clinical approach designed to support individuals with chronic respiratory diseases through structured exercise and educational strategies. Pulmonary telerehabilitation (PTR) represents a remote adaptation of this approach, offering services through virtual platforms. This model may enhance patient engagement and adherence due to its convenience and accessibility. However, its implementation remains inconsistent across healthcare institutions, potentially limiting its benefits for both healthcare providers and patients. Objective: This study aimed to assess the level of acceptance and identify the factors and barriers influencing the intention of healthcare practitioners (HCPs) to use PTR in Saudi Arabia.
methodA cross-sectional survey was conducted among HCPs involved in pulmonary rehabilitation across Saudi Arabia between August 2024 and May 2025. Participants completed an online questionnaire using the pre-validated Tele Pulmonary Rehabilitation Acceptance Scale (TPRAS), which measures behavioral intention (BI) as the dependent variable, and perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) as independent variables. Linear regression analysis was applied to examine the impact of PU and PEOU on BI.
resultsA total of 59 practitioners participated in the study. Among them, 82.77% demonstrated a strong willingness to engage with PTR. PU was identified as the most influential factor shaping behavioral intention. Of the HCPs, 76.27% accepted the PEOU of PTR equipment, while 81.35% of HCPs had positive BI to use PTR. Commonly cited challenges included unstable internet connectivity and limited patient engagement.
conclusionThe intention among HCPs to implement PTR appears to be strongly associated with their perceptions of its usefulness and ease of application. Addressing identified barriers could further support the adoption of this technology in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.