ArticleCureus2025
Determining the Impact of Medical Arabic Workshops on Medical Students' Preparedness and Communication Skills With Arabic-Speaking Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction While Wayne State University School of Medicine (WSUSOM) serves a large Arab-American patient population, medical students have limited opportunities for formal instruction in medical Arabic, which may hinder effective communication with Arabic-speaking patients. To address this gap, a series of medical Arabic workshops was implemented, focusing on medical terminology and patient interaction. This study evaluates the impact of these workshops on students' self-reported preparedness and confidence when interacting with Arabic-speaking patients. Notably, there is a lack of prior US-based studies examining the effectiveness of structured medical Arabic training for medical students, further underscoring the novelty and relevance of this research. Methods An anonymous survey was distributed to WSUSOM students who attended one or more medical Arabic workshops. The survey utilized a five-point Likert scale (1 = never, 5 = always) to assess domains such as communication confidence, comprehension preparedness, and perceived training utility. A total of 119 students completed the pre-workshop survey, and 110 completed the post-workshop survey. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare weighted averages across domains before and after the workshops, with p-values <0.05 considered significant. Results Participation in the medical Arabic workshops was associated with statistically significant improvements in students' confidence and preparedness when interacting with Arabic-speaking patients. Pre-workshop, the weighted average score for confidence in understanding Arabic in clinical settings was 2.18 (SD = 1.34), which increased to 3.14 (SD = 1.15) post-workshop (p < 0.0001). Similarly, students' confidence in communicating health information rose from an average of 2.10 (SD = 1.21) to 3.17 (SD = 1.09) after attending the workshops (p < 0.0001). Additionally, the proportion of students reporting regular use of Arabic in clinical encounters remained high, but post-workshop responses indicated a reduction in the frequency with which students needed clarification during patient interactions. Overall, the majority of participants agreed that the workshops enhanced their clinical skills and preparedness to serve Arabic-speaking patients. Conclusions Medical Arabic workshops effectively improved medical students' confidence and readiness to engage with Arabic-speaking patients. These findings suggest that targeted language and cultural competency training may enhance communication and clinical performance, and that integration of similar programs into the formal medical school curriculum could help address language barriers in patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.