Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40786375›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Epinastine Eyelid Cream as a Practical Option for Patients With Glaucoma on Multidrug Topical Therapy: A Case Report.

Yui Nishijima, Daisuke Hasegawa, Tatsuya Mimura

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yui NishijimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Kanagawa, JPN.
Daisuke HasegawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Kanagawa, JPN.
Tatsuya MimuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine, Kanagawa, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with glaucoma often require long-term use of multiple ophthalmic medications, which can make adherence to additional treatments, such as anti-allergic eye drops for seasonal allergic conjunctivitis, particularly challenging. Moreover, corticosteroid eye drops or ointments, commonly used to manage ocular allergy, are generally avoided in these patients due to the risk of increasing intraocular pressure. We report a case in which a patient with glaucoma, already undergoing multiple topical therapies, experienced recurrent allergic conjunctivitis and blepharitis each spring. The use of conventional anti-allergic eye drops had limited efficacy due to poor adherence associated with the complexity of the treatment regimen. To address this, a newly introduced epinastine cream was applied to the eyelids once daily as an alternative treatment. Following this change, the patient's allergic ocular symptoms improved substantially, with enhanced treatment compliance and no adverse effects on intraocular pressure during follow-up. This case suggests that non-ocular-drop formulations, such as eyelid creams, may offer a practical and effective approach for managing allergic eye disease in patients with glaucoma who are already on complex topical regimens.

Indexed as

adherenceallergic conjunctivitisepinastineeye dropseyelid creamglaucoma

Identifiers

PMID40786375
PMCPMC12333317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.