ArticleCureus2025
Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: Secondary Analysis of RCT Data.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Esketamine combined with hydromorphone versus hydromorphone for post-operative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in children: a randomized controlled trial.European journal of medical research · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Oliceridine for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Resection Surgery for Gastrointestinal Malignant Tumors: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Erector spinae plane versus transversus abdominis plane block for hysterectomy: Beyond statistical significance.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Modern anesthesia focuses on the patient's perception of achieved pain relief rather than just statistical significance. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) are measures of patient-reported outcomes. MCID in pain scores refers to the minimum reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS) or numeric rating scale (NRS) scores that leads to a perceptible improvement in pain, although it may not necessarily indicate full pain relief. PASS, on the other hand, is the threshold beyond which patients consider themselves to be in an acceptable state of well-being. These patient-centered outcomes reflect the clinical significance of the achieved pain relief from the patient's perspective. Furthermore, these metrics can guide anesthesiologists toward postoperative pain management targets. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID in NRS scores and PASS after total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Methods This study represents a secondary analysis of a double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in total abdominal hysterectomy. The primary outcome was to determine the distribution-based MCID in NRS scores. The MCID was calculated as the average of three values derived from distinct distribution-based methods: (1) a proportion of the pooled standard deviation (SD), (2) a proportion of the standard error of measurement (SEM) in the control group, and (3) 10% of the scale range. The secondary outcome was to assess PASS. PASS was determined using the "threshold approach," identifying the pain score threshold that most accurately predicted patient satisfaction with pain relief. This was achieved by determining the value that yielded the best sensitivity and specificity in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results The MCID for pain intensity, calculated as the mean value (1.5) derived from three distribution-based methods, represents the threshold for meaningful improvement. Concurrently, an NRS score of ≤3.5 was identified as the PASS threshold, indicating a high probability of patient satisfaction. This value defines the treatment target representing an acceptable level of symptom control. Conclusion Our findings establish an MCID of 1.5 and a PASS of ≤3.5 for NRS pain scores following total abdominal hysterectomy, defining clinically meaningful improvement and treatment targets to support more personalized and effective postoperative pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.