Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40786312›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Postoperative Abulia Following Resection of Bilateral Anterior Cingulate Gyrus Glioblastoma: A Case Report and Lessons Learned.

Narushi Sugii, Goichiro Tamura, Eiichi Ishikawa

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Narushi SugiiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, JPN.
Goichiro TamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Mito, JPN.
Eiichi IshikawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is a highly malignant brain tumor with a dismal prognosis that requires multidisciplinary treatment, emphasizing 'maximal safe resection' during surgery. Neurosurgeons often rely on empirical knowledge, which suggests that removing only contrast-enhancing lesions should not cause new neurological deficits. However, we encountered a case in which this assumption did not hold true. A 60-year-old, right-handed man presented with declining frontal lobe function and a large mass involving the bilateral anterior cingulate gyrus (ACG) and left superior frontal gyrus (SFG). After initial removal of the left SFG tumor, the patient showed no new deficits. The pathological diagnosis confirmed glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. A second surgery was performed to resect the remaining contrast-enhancing lesions involving the bilateral dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), via the initial surgical corridor. Postoperatively, the patient developed persistent abulia. This case highlights a critical exception to prevailing surgical dogma. Although the resection targeted only contrast-enhancing tissue, the involvement of the bilateral dACC, a key node of the salience network, likely led to severe cognitive and motivational dysfunction. Greater attention to functional neuroanatomy may be necessary to optimize outcomes in complex glioblastoma cases, even within contrast-enhancing tumor regions.

Indexed as

abuliaakinetic mutismanterior cingulate cortexglioblastomasalience network

Identifiers

PMID40786312
PMCPMC12333896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.