Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40786275›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Impact of E-cigarette Use on Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Elderly Former Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Anil Reddy Padi, Rutvij Patel, Maheshwar Dumpala, Ayesha Anjum, Israr Ahmed, Venkata Sai Krishna Reddy Dronadula, Zain Bin Saeed, Muhammad Sohail S Mirza, Ramya Reddy Jonnala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anil Reddy PadiInternal Medicine, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, IND.
Rutvij PatelInternal Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, USA.
Maheshwar DumpalaInternal Medicine, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, IND.
Ayesha AnjumInternal Medicine, Fatima Memorial Hospital College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, PAK.
Israr AhmedInternal Medicine, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Venkata Sai Krishna Reddy DronadulaInternal Medicine, HCA Healthcare Medical City, Denton, USA.
Zain Bin SaeedInternal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, PAK.
Muhammad Sohail S MirzaInternal Medicine, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, CHN.
Ramya Reddy JonnalaInternal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E-cigarette (EC) use has been associated with several chronic cardiovascular effects. These include arterial stiffness, endothelial dysfunction, and increased oxidative stress. Despite the fact that the use of ECs has been welcomed as potentially less dangerous than alternatives compared to the smoking of conventional cigarettes, the impact that the utilization of ECs has on cardiovascular condition is an issue that is open to a controversial debate. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to ascertain the cardiovascular risk of EC smoking as related to that of nonsmoking and conventional smoking. The exhaustive search was conducted on a variety of databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) for identifying cross-sectional studies, randomized controlled trials, and observational cohort studies that were published between 2015 and 2025. Pooled analysis was performed on the data, and the correlation coefficient was estimated through a model of random effects. The heterogeneity was assessed through the publication bias, and the I² statistic was tackled through funnel plots and Egger's test. The overall analysis demonstrated that EC smoking was related to higher vascular stiffness and oxidative stress, although to a lesser degree compared to conventional cigarette smoking. The total effect size indicated a positive but moderate relationship (r = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.45-0.81) between EC smoking and cardiovascular risks. Although the results were encouraging, there was substantial heterogeneity (I² = 99.99%), showing variation in findings. This implies that future research is obligatory to explicate appropriate long-term cardiovascular consequences of EC consumption, especially among dual users.

Indexed as

cardiovascular risk (cvr)e-cigarette useheterogeneityoxidative stressvascular stiffness

Identifiers

PMID40786275
PMCPMC12335223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.