ReviewCureus2025
Impact of E-cigarette Use on Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Elderly Former Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of a nomogram model for postoperative complications following thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery in elderly patients: a study based on an elderly patient population.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction and Increased Oxidative Stress in Conventional Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes: Heart Rate Variability as a Cardiovascular Predictor.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
E-cigarette (EC) use has been associated with several chronic cardiovascular effects. These include arterial stiffness, endothelial dysfunction, and increased oxidative stress. Despite the fact that the use of ECs has been welcomed as potentially less dangerous than alternatives compared to the smoking of conventional cigarettes, the impact that the utilization of ECs has on cardiovascular condition is an issue that is open to a controversial debate. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to ascertain the cardiovascular risk of EC smoking as related to that of nonsmoking and conventional smoking. The exhaustive search was conducted on a variety of databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) for identifying cross-sectional studies, randomized controlled trials, and observational cohort studies that were published between 2015 and 2025. Pooled analysis was performed on the data, and the correlation coefficient was estimated through a model of random effects. The heterogeneity was assessed through the publication bias, and the I² statistic was tackled through funnel plots and Egger's test. The overall analysis demonstrated that EC smoking was related to higher vascular stiffness and oxidative stress, although to a lesser degree compared to conventional cigarette smoking. The total effect size indicated a positive but moderate relationship (r = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.45-0.81) between EC smoking and cardiovascular risks. Although the results were encouraging, there was substantial heterogeneity (I² = 99.99%), showing variation in findings. This implies that future research is obligatory to explicate appropriate long-term cardiovascular consequences of EC consumption, especially among dual users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.