ArticleCureus2025
Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Immunohistochemistry in Breast Cancer.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Post-Surgical Reassessment of Breast Cancer IHC: Concordance, Δ-Metrics, and Treatment-Relevant Reclassification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a key treatment strategy for locally advanced or high-risk early-stage breast cancer. This study aims to evaluate the effects of NACT on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2 status, and Ki67 index, which are crucial markers for breast cancer prognosis and treatment decisions. Methods A cohort of 62 female breast cancer patients underwent NACT with varied regimens. Baseline and post-treatment data on ER, PR, HER2 status, and Ki67 were collected through immunohistochemistry and sonomammography. Statistical analysis was performed using R software, with Wilcoxon rank-sum and paired t-tests for primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Results Significant changes were observed in receptor statuses post-NACT. Notably, 8.3% of ER-negative patients converted to ER-positive, 14.2% of PR-negative patients became PR-positive, and 16.6% of HER2-negative patients became HER2-positive. Ki67 levels decreased significantly from 51.7% to 26.28% (p < 0.001), indicating reduced tumor proliferation. Discussion The shifts in ER, PR, and HER2 status suggest the dynamic nature of breast cancer during chemotherapy, with implications for personalized treatment strategies. The reduction in Ki67 indicates a favorable tumor response, though tumor heterogeneity and treatment resistance remain challenges. These findings underscore the importance of post-treatment molecular profiling to guide therapy decisions and optimize patient outcomes. Conclusion NACT significantly alters the molecular profile of breast cancer, including receptor status and Ki67 levels, which can inform personalized treatment strategies. These findings highlight the need for post-NACT reassessment to tailor follow-up therapies and improve long-term patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.