ArticleCureus2025
Outcomes of Secondary Ovulation Induction Following Failed Oocyte Pick-Up in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Cycles: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFailed oocyte pick-up (FOPU) is the absence of oocyte retrieval from mature follicles after ovulation induction in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. The incidence of FOPU is rare in IVF cycles.
methodsThis retrospective cohort single-center study compared a 36-hour time interval between a second trigger and ovum pick-up (OPU) in FOPU and a 24-hour time interval between a second trigger and OPU in FOPU. In total, 62 couples with FOPU between July 2011 and April 2024 were included in the study. Of the 62 patients included, 49 underwent a 36-hour time interval between trigger and OPU (group 1), and 13 couples underwent a 24-hour time interval between trigger and OPU (group 2). The primary outcome measured was oocyte retrieval, and the secondary outcomes were fertilization, blastocyst, and pregnancy rates.
resultsWe compared 49 patients from group 1 and 13 from group 2. After a 36-hour time interval, oocyte retrieval in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (8.3 ± 5.7 versus 2.7 ± 3.8, p < 0.001). Furthermore, fertilization, blastocyst, and pregnancy rates were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2, respectively (61% versus 13.8%, p < 0.001; 32.8% versus 0%, p < 0.001; and 37.8% versus 0%, p < 0.001).
conclusionStrong evidence for overcoming primary impaired oocyte retrieval is still lacking in the literature. However, a 36-hour time interval between a second trigger and OPU seems ideal for FOPU cases. Therefore, communication between the physician and embryologist is crucial during OPU to detect such cases, especially in couples with a history of FOPU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.