ArticleCureus2025
The Complexity of Aging: Managing Multimorbidity in Geriatrics.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interprofessional geriatric competencies in the DACH region (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) : Insights from a multinational multilingual open online survey.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026Article
- Clinical Trials in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Multimorbidity: A Perspective on Pragmatic Trial Design.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Burden and associated factors of depressive symptoms among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in rural southeast Nigeria: a community-based cross-sectional study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study, conducted using electronic health records from a geriatric healthcare system in Pakistan, focused on multimorbidity and polypharmacy, involving 600 participants (297 females and 303 males) with a nearly equal gender distribution. The sample was diverse in terms of socioeconomic status, with 195 (32.5%) participants hailing from high socioeconomic backgrounds, 184 (30.7%) from low socioeconomic backgrounds, and 221 (36.8%) from middle-class backgrounds. Regarding education, 139 (23.2%) had postgraduate education, and 132 (22.0%) had no formal education. In terms of living conditions, 171 (28.5%) lived alone, 146 (24.3%) in assisted living, and 145 (24.2%) in nursing homes. The mean age of participants was 81.59 years [standard deviation (SD) = 10.3], and the majority exhibited moderate physical (42.7%) and cognitive decline (45.7%). Most participants had moderate to severe multimorbidity (289 participants, 48.2%), and polypharmacy was common, with 321 (53.5%) taking five or more medications. Social isolation was high, with 289 (48.2%) participants experiencing difficulty engaging socially. Healthcare utilization was varied: 157 (26.2%) visited primary care once a month, and 169 (28.2%) attended specialist care twice a year. Hospitalization frequency averaged 4.51 visits (SD = 2.87), and emergency visits averaged 6.96 (SD = 4.22). Exploratory data analysis (EDA) identified significant correlations between polypharmacy and hospitalization frequency (r = 0.17, p<0.05) and a negative correlation with functional status (r = -0.11, p<0.05). Logistic regression revealed that polypharmacy [odds ratio (OR) = 1.35, p<0.05] and socioeconomic status (OR = 1.52, p<0.01) were significant predictors of adverse health events. This study underscores the complex healthcare needs of the elderly with multiple chronic conditions, highlighting the need for integrated care strategies to address both physical and mental health challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.