ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2025
Two-year outcome of a treatment program for alcohol use disorder in regional and rural India.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a major health issue in developing countries, posing a significant economic burden with limited access to comprehensive treatment and follow-up services. AUD treatment services are limited in India, especially in regional and rural areas. Methods: This retrospective study assessed outcomes in patients with AUD from a rural and regional part of India admitted to a voluntary treatment program with a 2-year follow-up after initial detoxification. The primary outcome measures were the extent and duration of abstinence achieved at the end of 2 years. The secondary outcome measures were quality of life, psychological wellbeing, and family burden. Results: One hundred sixty-nine out of 180 patients (93.9%) completed the 2-year program. Sustained abstinence was achieved by 81.1% of patients and sustained low-risk drinking by 14.8% in an uncontrolled environment. There was a significant improvement in the quality of life and psychological wellbeing and a reduction in the total family burden. Patients sustaining total abstinence experienced a higher family burden at intake than those with low-risk drinking. Conclusion: The majority of patients with AUD achieved total abstinence in communities with limited specialist health services with appropriate treatment and follow-up services. Factors influencing such positive outcomes could be the voluntary nature of the program, setting up total abstinence as the treatment goal, collaborative support of the family, access to low-cost treatment and extended follow-up, and use of disulfiram. A future prospective study using a control group addressing this study's limitations is required to confirm the observed outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.