ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2025
Self-assessment of P.O.C.U.S. use in the clinical practice of anesthesia and intensive care by medical residents after completion of simulation training on a high-fidelity simulator.
Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of an artificial-intelligence-based transesophageal echocardiography simulation system in residency training.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Simulation based education and training (SBET) is an important part of formal medical education and training, with anesthesia and intensive care domains being among the first to use this teaching method. Implementation of SBET into anesthesia and intensive care training is included in the recommendations lists of the European Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, with Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) being on the list of procedures that residents should be trained in using SBET. Objectives: In this study the objective is to assess the clinical use of POCUS by trainees in Anesthesia and Intensive Care that finished a simulation program on a high-fidelity simulator. Methods: We developed a questionnaire comprised of seven sections that evaluates the use of POCUS in clinical practice related to airway, lung, cardiac ultrasound, the availability of POCUS, possible barriers that create limitations, as well as scoring and feedback regarding the simulation sessions and distributed it to trainees that finished the simulation sessions. Results: Over 90% of respondents declare using POCUS in their daily clinical practice, with more use of pulmonary evaluations than cardiac evaluations. Most of the responders declared good or very good knowledge and ability to diagnose most of the critical conditions described in the curriculum for lung and cardiac POCUS. Conclusions: Self-assessment methods may be used alongside traditional methods to offer a wider view on POCUS competency and maintenance of skills of trainees in anesthesia and intensive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.