ArticleEJHaem2025
Machine Learning Algorithm to Explore Patients With Heterogeneous Treatment Effects of Clinically Significant CMV Infection and Non-Relapse Mortality After HSCT.
Article in EJHaem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a stacked ensemble model for risk stratification of chronic GVHD after allogeneic HSCT: Japanese nation-wide cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Immune monitoring for relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in clinical laboratories.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection (csCMVi) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) remain serious concerns after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but subpopulations with heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) is unclear. Although machine learning (ML) algorithms have recently been applied to HSCT, the methodology has not been well elucidated. Methods: We developed a ML algorithm which combined weighting procedures and left-truncated and right-censored trees based on classification and regression tree algorithms to fit survival data with time-varying covariates and competing risks comprehensively. The Japanese large-scale registry data were applied to the algorithm to explore subpopulations with HTEs of csCMVi and NRM after HSCT. Its performance was evaluated by comparing their c-indices with those of the conventional Fine-Gray model. Results: A total of 10,480 patients were divided into training (75%) and test (25%) cohorts; the training cohort was used to develop the ML model. Using the model, patient CMV-seropositivity, patient age, and acute graft-versus-host disease were identified as important predictors of csCMVi. In addition, the patients were successfully classified by the estimated cumulative incidence of csCMVi, which varied from 22.7% at 0.5 year to 82.7%. This model also depicts interpretable survival trees in various settings. Similarly, the patients can be also classified based on the estimated 3-year NRM, which varied from 8.0% to 48.5%. C-indices of the ML and the Fine-Gray model using the test cohort showed comparable performance. Conclusion: A reliable, explainable, and interpretable ML model was developed to explore subpopulations with HTEs of csCMVi and NRM after HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.