Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40786177›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Global, regional, and national burden of endocrine, metabolic, blood, and immune disorders from 1990 to 2021, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study.

Jinpai Liang, Hongyan Leng, Xuelian Bai, Linling Li, Tao Qin, Jiazhi Ruan, Guoxing Wang, Wenjuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jinpai LiangDepartment of Endocrinology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Alaer Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medical, Alar, Xinjiang, China.
Hongyan LengDepartment of Endocrinology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Alaer Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medical, Alar, Xinjiang, China.
Xuelian BaiDepartment of Endocrinology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Alaer Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medical, Alar, Xinjiang, China.
Linling LiDepartment of Endocrinology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Alaer Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medical, Alar, Xinjiang, China.
Tao QinDepartment of Endocrinology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Alaer Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medical, Alar, Xinjiang, China.
Jiazhi RuanDepartment of Endocrinology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Alaer Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medical, Alar, Xinjiang, China.
Guoxing WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medical, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wenjuan ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Alaer Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medical, Alar, Xinjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endocrine, metabolic, blood, and immune disorders (EMBID) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with substantial regional disparities. Despite advancements in diagnosis and treatment, the burden of EMBID continues to rise. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the global, regional, and national burden of EMBID from 1990 to 2021, with projections to 2050. Methods: We conducted a systematic analysis using data from the GBD 2021, covering 204 countries and territories, 21 GBD regions, and five Socio-demographic Index (SDI) groups. Age-standardized rates of incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for EMBID were estimated using the GBD analytical framework. Temporal trends were assessed using estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) derived from log-linear regression. Bayesian age-period-cohort (BAPC) models were applied for projections to 2050. Decomposition analysis attributed changes in disease burden to population growth, aging, and epidemiological shifts. Results: In 2021, the global incidence of EMBID was 79.47 million (95% UI 63.34-98.63 million), with an age-standardized rate of 957.58 (95% UI 766.99-1,183.95) per 100,000, showing a slight decline (EAPC: -0.24% [95% CI -0.35 - -0.12]). Prevalence reached 475.78 million (95% UI 381.23-591.19 million), while deaths rose to 175,902 (95% UI 154,306-190,755; EAPC: 0.75% [95% CI 0.67-0.83]). DALYs totaled 12.86 million (95% UI 9.94-16.98 million), with an age-standardized rate of 157.66 (95% UI 122.38-206.92) per 100,000 (EAPC: -0.09% [95% CI -0.16 - -0.02]). Females had higher incidence and prevalence, while males showed higher mortality. Older adults (≥70 years) experienced the highest burden. Decomposition analysis attributed rising DALYs to population aging (26.02%) and growth (85.83%). Regionally, high-SDI regions showed declining incidence, while low-SDI regions had limited progress. Projections to 2050 indicate declining incidence and prevalence but rising mortality among older adults. Conclusion: The global burden of EMBID has demonstrated substantial geographical and temporal variability, with lower-SDI regions bearing the highest burden. Addressing these disparities requires enhanced preventive measures, improved healthcare access, and targeted interventions, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Endocrine System DiseasesGlobal Burden of DiseaseHematologic DiseasesImmune System DiseasesMetabolic DiseasesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDisability-Adjusted Life YearsFemaleGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceage-specific trendsdecomposition analysisendocrine metabolic blood and immune disordersfuture projectionsglobal burden of diseasesocio-demographic index

Identifiers

PMID40786177
PMCPMC12331491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.