ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025
Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation With Mannitol for Colonoscopy: The SATISFACTION Study.
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04759885 (Efficacy and Safety of mAnniTol in Bowel Preparation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of mAnniTol in Bowel Preparation: Assessment of Adequacy and Presence of Intestinal levelS of Hydrogen and Methane During Elective Colonoscopy aFter mAnnitol or Standard Split 2-liter Polyethylene Glycol Solution Plus asCorbaTe - a Phase II/III, International, Multicentre, Randomized, Parallel-group, endoscOpist-bliNded, Dose-finding/Non-inferiority Study - SATISFACTION
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation With Mannitol for Colonoscopy: The SATISFACTION Study.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bowel preparation for colonoscopy causes significant discomfort to patients. Large volumes, unpleasant taste, and split-dosing are the main disadvantages of most laxatives. Oral mannitol could be an attractive option because it acts quickly, requires low volumes, and has a pleasant taste. Aims: A Phase III study (SATISFACTION) compared oral mannitol with polyethylene glycol-ascorbate (PEG-ADC). This Methods: The SATISFACTION Phase III study was an international, multicenter, randomized (1:1), parallel-group, endoscopist-blinded, non-inferiority trial. Taste of preparations, ease of use, and willingness to repeat the preparation with the same product were scored and assessed by the patients. Results: Bowel preparation with oral mannitol resulted in a better patient satisfaction profile for all PROMs evaluated. Conclusion: Oral mannitol for bowel preparation achieved high patient satisfaction and might be a valuable option for colonoscopy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04759885).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.