ReviewRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Airway Management Following Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction: When is a Tracheostomy Necessary?
Review in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adverse Airway Events Following Head and Neck Cancer Reconstruction Without Elective Tracheostomy.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Emergency management protocols for major complications after oral and maxillofacial surgery: emphasis on airway and bleeding control.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting prolonged ICU length of stay after oral free flap reconstruction without prophylactic tracheostomy.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Sugammadex and Postoperative Respiratory Failure in Head and Neck Surgery: A Cohort Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head and neck free flap reconstruction presents complex airway challenges due to postoperative swelling, bleeding, and anatomical distortion that can jeopardize breathing. Many centers once performed routine prophylactic tracheostomy for major cases, yet modern evidence favors a selective strategy. Avoiding an unnecessary tracheostomy when feasible can reduce morbidity, shorten hospital stay, accelerate return to oral intake, and lower cost. Contemporary practice relies on careful intraoperative assessment. Low-risk patients can be extubated immediately or after brief observation, whereas high-risk features-extensive tongue or base of tongue resection, bilateral neck dissection, bulky flap, or marked edema-mandate a tracheostomy to avert obstruction. There is new update to TRACHY (an acronym that represents Tumor extent, Reconstruction type, Airway anatomy, Coexisting conditions, History of prior treatment, and bilateral neck dissection "lateralitY") scoring systems and risk stratification tools, which assign risk points to support decisions. Once a tracheostomy is placed, decannulation proceeds when airway patency is secure, the patient is alert with a strong cough, the surgical site is stable, swallowing is safe or alternative feeding is available, capping trials are successful, and the multidisciplinary team agrees. A tailored approach therefore balances airway safety with the benefits of tracheostomy avoidance, optimizing outcomes for patients undergoing complex head and neck reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.