ArticlePeerJ2025
Harnessing citizen science for marine conservation in Malta: a comparative analysis of GAM and MaxEnt models in bottlenose dolphin habitat mapping.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Species distribution models (SDMs) are powerful tools for informing conservation, particularly for highly mobile marine species such as common bottlenose dolphins ( Methods: In this study, we analyzed and compared the outputs of a generalized additive model (GAM) and a maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model to assess summer habitat suitability for bottlenose dolphins within a coastal SAC in Malta. The models were informed by presence-only data collected through systematic surveys and a citizen science campaign, integrated with environmental and anthropogenic predictors including chlorophyll-a concentration, sea surface temperature anomaly, slope, and distance to aquaculture sites. Results: Both modeling approaches identified high habitat suitability in shallow, nearshore regions, with chlorophyll-a concentration and proximity to aquaculture sites emerging as the most important predictors. Slope and sea surface temperature anomaly contributed less substantially. The two models showed spatial agreement in highlighting these nearshore areas as core habitats, though GAM predicted a broader extent of suitable habitat, whereas MaxEnt results were more spatially restricted. Both models demonstrated strong predictive performance (AUC > 0.85), reinforcing the ecological relevance of the identified drivers. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential of integrating opportunistic data with SDMs to support habitat assessments in data-limited contexts. The use of complementary modeling approaches provides robust insights into species-environment relationships. These results aim to guide spatial planning and future assessments of conservation priorities in Maltese coastal waters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.