ArticleF1000Research2024
Deep learning neural network development for the classification of bacteriocin sequences produced by lactic acid bacteria.
Article in F1000Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacteriocins as precision antimicrobials: genomic exploration and oral applications of Lactobacillus peptides.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- HKDE-LACM: a hybrid model for lactic acid bacteria classification via k-mer and DNABERT-2 embedding fusion with cyclic DE-BO optimization.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Deep learning neural network development for the classification of bacteriocin sequences produced by lactic acid bacteria.F1000Research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria presents a pressing need for exploring new natural compounds with innovative mechanisms to replace existing antibiotics. Bacteriocins offer promising alternatives for developing therapeutic and preventive strategies in livestock, aquaculture, and human health. Specifically, those produced by LAB are recognized as GRAS and QPS. This study aims to develop a deep learning model specifically designed to classify bacteriocins by their LAB origin, using interpretable k-mer features and embedding vectors to enable applications in antimicrobial discover. Methods: We developed a deep learning neural network for binary classification of bacteriocin amino acid sequences (BacLAB vs. Non-BacLAB). Features were extracted using k-mers (k=3,5,7,15,20) and vector embeddings (EV). Ten feature combinations were tested (e.g., EV, EV+5-mers+7-mers). Sequences were filtered by length (50-2000 AA) to ensure uniformity, and class balance was maintained (24,964 BacLAB vs. 25,000 Non-BacLAB). The model was trained on Google Colab, demonstrating computational accessibility without specialized hardware. Results: The '5-mers+7-mers+EV' group achieved the best performance, with k-fold cross-validation (k=30) showing: 9.90% loss, 90.14% accuracy, 90.30% precision, 90.10% recall and F1 score. Folder 22 stood out with 8.50% loss, 91.47% accuracy, and 91.00% precision, recall, and F1 score. Five sets of 100 LAB-specific k-mers were identified, revealing conserved motifs. Despite high accuracy, sequence length variation (50-2000 AA) may bias k-mer representation, favoring longer sequences. Additionally, experimental validation is required to confirm the biological activity of predicted bacteriocins. These aspects highlight directions for future research. Conclusions: The model developed in this study achieved consistent results with those seen in the reviewed literature. It outperformed some studies by 3-10%. Its implementation in resource-limited settings is feasible via cloud platforms like Google Colab. The identified k-mers could guide the design of synthetic antimicrobials, pending further in vitro validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.