ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Enhancing clinical reasoning skills through tailored CPC in pathology laboratory instruction.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In medical education, fostering students' clinical reasoning skills is crucial for assessing their clinical proficiency. However, developing a Clinical Pathological Conference (CPC) model tailored to the unique needs of early-stage learners remains an intriguing avenue for exploration. Methods: This study aimed to enhance the clinical reasoning and critical thinking abilities of early-stage medical students in pathology laboratory instruction through the introduction of a customized CPC teaching method. A total of 279 undergraduate students from the clinical medicine program at Hangzhou City University participated in the study. The 2021 cohort ( Results: Students who underwent the CPC case teaching method exhibited higher levels of enthusiasm, participation, learning efficiency, and clinical reasoning abilities compared to those following traditional teaching methods. Quantitative results also showed improvements in post-class case analysis and final examination scores. Qualitative feedback indicated that the method was generally well-received, although some students suggested improvements in group collaboration and personalized guidance. Conclusion: The course-specific CPC teaching method effectively enhances students' learning enthusiasm, classroom participation, learning efficiency, and clinical thinking abilities in pathology laboratory instruction. These findings pave the way for future research to explore the design and implementation of CPC methods in other foundational medical courses and to evaluate their effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.