ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Genetics of kidney stones and the role of genetic testing in prevention: a guide for urologists.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causal association between sleep disorders and nephrolithiasis: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Molecular and Genetic Determinants of Nephrocalcinosis: Mechanisms, Genotype-Phenotype Correlations, and Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kidney Stone Disease (KSD) has a high prevalence (approximately 10%) and high recurrence risk: almost half of stone former patients will experience recurrence within 5-10 years. To date, KSD is managed mostly surgically with a heavy burden on the healthcare system and numerous invasive procedures for the patients. In the past years a genetic basis in KSD has been increasingly recognized, with a heritability rate reaching 50%. Through Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) several genetic causes of recurrent nephrolithiasis have been untangled, paving the way to new therapies and prevention strategies, through precision medicine-based approaches. Many loci with more than 200 unique genes have been associated with KSD susceptibility thanks to GWAS, even though the development of a polygenic risk score is still in progress. Moreover, today, about 40 genes linked to monogenic disease that are involved in kidney stones have been identified, leading to a precise diagnosis in cases that were previously considered idiopathic. Despite these advancements, genetic testing in kidney stone formers remains underutilized and inconsistently available. The absence of clear diagnostic guidelines, standardization, and widespread awareness, combined with lack of perceived benefit, has left the decision to test largely at the discretion of individual physicians. This paper reviews the updated evidences in KSD genetics and suggest a diagnostic algorithm aimed to increase the diagnostic rate of genetic stones, allowing a personalized treatment and, in turn, a higher disease-free survival for the patients and a more efficient allocation of resources, analyzing the cost-effectiveness of genetic testing in urolithiasis. Besides, it will provide a further look to promising prospects in the field of prevention methods for kidney stones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.